|Full Name||Hernandez v. Mesa|
|Short Name||Hernandez v. Mesa|
|Date Argued (Reargued)||Nov. 12, 2019|
|Date Decided||Feb. 25, 2020|
Whether, when the plaintiffs plausibly allege that a rogue federal law-enforcement officer violated clearly established Fourth and Fifth amendment rights for which there is no alternative legal remedy, the federal courts can and should recognize a damages claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics.