Want to make your own predictions?

  Join Now!


  • Outcome Prediction Evolution Chart
  • Justice Predictions Evolution Table

Case Profile

Docket Number18-6493
Term2019
Full NameBanister v. Davis
Short NameBanister v. Davis
PetitionerBanister
RespondentDavis
Date Argued (Reargued)Dec. 4, 2019
Date DecidedJune 1, 2020

Question Presented

Whether and under what circumstances a timely Rule 59(e) motion should be recharacterized as a second or successive habeas petition under Gonzalez v. Crosby.

Case Prediction Summary

- correct prediction- wrong prediction
Total Prediction Count432
Votes for Justice Affirm94
Votes to Justice Reverse338
% Justice (A)ffirm/(R)everse
79 (R)
Votes for Outcome Affirm8
Votes for Outcome Reverse40
% Outcome (A)ffirm/(R)everse
84 (R)
Predicted Outcome
Reverse

User Predictions Summary

Recent Prediction Activity last 10 predictions

« Back to the case list