| Docket Number | 25-498 |
| Term | 2026 |
| Full Name | Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee |
| Short Name | Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee |
| Petitioner | None |
| Respondent | None |
| Date Argued (Reargued) | Oct. 6, 2026 |
| Date Decided |
Whether, for claims predicated on fund underperformance, pleading that an Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary failed to use the requisite “care, skill, prudence, or diligence” under the circumstances and thus breached ERISA’s duty of prudence when investing plan assets requires alleging a “meaningful benchmark.”
| FantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction | {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction | Final SCOTUS Decision |
|---|---|---|
3 Reverse6 Affirm | 0 Reverse0 Affirm | 0 Reverse0 Affirm |
| Justice |
FantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction | {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction | Final SCOTUS Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | ||
| Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... |
| No | Date | Description |
|---|
| Name | Party Name | Description | Address | Phone | Type |
|---|
© 2014-2019 Josh Blackman LLC Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Rules