Docket Number | 23-1259 |
Term | 2024 |
Full Name | BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman |
Short Name | BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman |
Petitioner | None |
Respondent | None |
Date Argued (Reargued) | March 3, 2025 |
Date Decided |
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint.
FantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction | {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction | Final SCOTUS Decision |
---|---|---|
0 Reverse9 Affirm | 0 Reverse0 Affirm | 0 Reverse0 Affirm |
Justice |
FantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction | {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction | Final SCOTUS Decision |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
![]() | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... |
No | Date | Description |
---|
Name | Party Name | Description | Address | Phone | Type |
---|
© 2014-2019 Josh Blackman LLC Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Rules