« Back to the case list
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman
Want to make your own predictions?
Join Now!- Outcome Prediction Evolution Chart
- Justice Predictions Evolution Table
Case Profile
| Docket Number | 23-1259 |
| Term | 2024 |
| Full Name | BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman |
| Short Name | BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman |
| Petitioner | None |
| Respondent | None |
| Date Argued (Reargued) | March 3, 2025 |
| Date Decided |
Question Presented
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint.
Case Prediction Summary
- correct prediction- wrong prediction
| Total Prediction Count | 117 |
| Votes for Justice Affirm | 38 |
| Votes to Justice Reverse | 79 |
| % Justice (A)ffirm/(R)everse |
68 (R)
|
| Votes for Outcome Affirm | 4 |
| Votes for Outcome Reverse | 9 |
| % Outcome (A)ffirm/(R)everse |
70 (R)
|
| Predicted Outcome |
Reverse
|
User Predictions Summary
Recent Prediction Activity last 10 predictions
© 2014-2019 Josh Blackman LLC Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Rules